The UK Government has recently announced plans to reform payment practices in the construction industry, including a proposed ban on the use of cash retentions in construction contracts. Whilst the precise legislative framework, scope and transitional arrangements remains to be confirmed, the potential impact on the industry will be substantial.
Retentions have been a standard feature of construction contracts for decades. Typically, an employer withholds a percentage of payments as security against defective works, with release staged between practical completion and the end of the defects liability period. For employers, this has offered a simple and relatively cost-effective means of ensuring contractor performance and post-completion engagement.
However, the practice has been widely criticised for placing disproportionate financial strain on contractors and subcontractors, particularly those further down the supply chain.
For employers, the removal of retentions raises important practical and commercial considerations. Retentions have traditionally provided a degree of leverage in securing the remedy of defects. Without them, employers may need to rely more heavily on alternative forms of protection, such as performance bonds, parent company guarantees, or enhanced contractual provisions governing defects and completion. More proactive contract administration and inspection regimes are also likely to become increasingly important.
Cost is another key consideration. The absence of retentions may lead to increased use of formal enforcement mechanisms where defects are not remedied. Where employers previously relied on the pressure created by withheld sums, disputes may be more likely to escalate into adjudication or litigation, with associated time and expense.
At a contractual level, standard form contracts will likely require amendment, and employers should be prepared to reconsider how risk is allocated across the lifecycle of a project. Early engagement with advisers and careful drafting will be key to ensuring that appropriate protections remain in place.
It is important to note that the proposal is not yet law. Primary legislation will be required, and a transition period to allow the industry time to adapt.
What About Scotland?
Although the proposal appears intended to have UK-wide effect, its application in Scotland is not automatic. Construction law engages devolved competence, meaning implementation may require either UK legislation extending to Scotland or separate Scottish legislation.
Employers operating in Scotland should therefore monitor developments closely, as both the detail of the proposal and the timing of its implementation may differ across jurisdictions.
We have an experienced team that are able to advise on all issues relating to construction law. Please contact our team here if you would like more information or advice.
